So much of our lives is now spent on screens, but books have rather stubbornly resisted this pattern.
We are often informed that technology is the inevitable development of things, an important enhancement that they would not survive without, but is this really accurate? It is a simple myth to buy into, we have all skilled how smart phones have made our lives simpler, offering us access to more things than we know how what to do with, but we likewise understand how it has damaged us also. And lots of things have really rather stubbornly withstood digitalisation, like books. Although it might have been expected that online books would make their print predecessors a thing of the past, that has actually not taken place at all, perhaps talking to the limits of digitalisation and blowing a book-shaped hole in the misconception of technological development. People like the CEO of the asset manager with a stake in Amazon books might understand how books have actually resisted being technologically updated.
So much of our lives now exists online. From our work to our entertainment and our shopping, the web now touches nearly every part of our lives. Although the web has actually definitely made a lot of things much easier and much more available for a great many individuals, it does take away from some things. Searching for beautiful books in a lovely little bookshop, for example, is definitely nicer than just hitting 'order' when buying them online. People like the co-CEO of the hedge fund that owns Waterstones would most likely value the happiness of offline shopping in bookshops.
In this day and age we invest a lot of our time taking a look at screens. Our work is really often on screens, and they are turning into a much larger part of our working life, and the way that we relax tends to use screens, and, maybe unsurprisingly, they ae turning into an even bigger part of our relaxation as well. For a lot of us, relaxation is associated with seeing movies or tv, all of which is done on a screen, or perhaps reading a book, which had been able to stay clear of the monopolisation of the screen till quite recently. Books are among the oldest technologies that we still utilize today, with the book as we know it today being practically unchanged for about 2 thousand years now. Although eBooks may have been offered as the unavoidable progression of the book, possibly having at least something in your life that you do away from a screen is reason enough to avoid them. People like the co-founder of the impact investor with a stake in World of Books would probably appreciate the appeal of checking out a book without the requirement for a screen.